Re: [PATCH] Undeprecate the sysctl system call

Ar Mer, 2006-10-18 am 14:41 +0200, ysgrifennodd Andi Kleen:
> It's less work long term, mostly because all the rejects for sysctl.h will 
> go away. And it's more compatible than just removing sysctl(2) completely.

What rejects for sysctl.h, nobody is going to add new entries to
sysctl(2) so there will be no rejects.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Undeprecate the sysctl system call
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- config SYSCTL_SYSCALL
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Undeprecate the sysctl system call
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Undeprecate the sysctl system call
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Undeprecate the sysctl system call
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Bandwidth Allocations under CFQ I/O Scheduler
Next by Date: Re: Bandwidth Allocations under CFQ I/O Scheduler
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Undeprecate the sysctl system call
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Undeprecate the sysctl system call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]