Alan Cox <[email protected]> writes:
>
> Its very simple: sysctl was a neat BSD syscall that turned out to be
> less ideal than using the fs for it. We added it, we supported it, we
> get to keep it. We just stick notes in the docs saying "please use /proc
> instead".
You call that numerical name space neat? IMHO it was a totally bogus
idea. There is already a perfectly fine file system name space, why
add another one?
Anyways, imho the right solution is to remove the numerical
sysctl infrastructure (including most of sysctl.h), but keep
sys_sysctl() with a small mapping table that maps the few
numerical sysctls (mostly KERN_VERSION) that are actually used to
path names internally. The rest should be ENOSYS.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
