On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 21:55 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > Well it always worked this way in earlier kernels and even if the
> > wrong module was suddenly used for some reason it shouldn't BUG.
> > So something is broken.
>
> True.
>
> There have been some changes in this area (David Howells made some
> changes which affected autofs4) and I'm not sure that the autofs module
> was reviewed. I didn't look closely at it at the time, I guess I should
> have. Sorry.
>
> It will take a while longer to work out if the autofs if open to the
> same issue resulting from Davids change.
Oh forgot .. I know it may be hard to do but could you try and confirm
whether it was autofs or autofs4. They are very different and I don't
want to stare at code trying to work out what's wrong if it's not
broken.
>
> Ian
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
