On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:13:21AM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > Easy - when they think they can provide equivalent functionality and hit > a lower price point (or make a bigger profit at the same price point) by > violating the standard. Or they think they can make their product using their own driver work better and faster and offer more bling than products using the existing driver, and they assume people will pay more for that hence justifying the expense. -- Len Sorensen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: John Richard Moser <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: John Richard Moser <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Kevin K <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: John Richard Moser <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: John Richard Moser <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pci: x86-32/64 switch to pci_get API
- Next by Date: Re: [Patch 3/3] Driver core: Per-subsystem multithreaded probing.
- Previous by thread: Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- Next by thread: bzip2 tarball 2.6.19-rc2 packaged wrong?
- Index(es):