On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 11:39 +0200, Kasper Sandberg wrote: > that makes very much sense, theres just one thing i dont understand. > > when there is an established standard, how can it EVER be in a > companys best interrest to develop a new product that doesent use it, > and thereby requires the development of new drivers, the distributing > of those drivers, and all that sort? Easy - when they think they can provide equivalent functionality and hit a lower price point (or make a bigger profit at the same price point) by violating the standard. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Lennart Sorensen <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- References:
- Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: John Richard Moser <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: John Richard Moser <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Kevin K <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: John Richard Moser <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: John Richard Moser <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
- Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- Prev by Date: Re: Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernel community?
- Next by Date: Re: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
- Previous by thread: Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- Next by thread: Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
- Index(es):