>> Yes, unfortunately this is another instance of gcc 4.0 generating bad >> unwind data when optimizing and not accumulating outgoing args. >> Andi - did you already create a patch implementing Michael's suggestion? > >You mean using -maccumulate-outgoing-args ? Not yet. > >I guess we can do it unconditionally for all gccs on both i386 >and x86-64, right? Yes, I concluded this from Michael's description; what I don't know is whether the option isn't available on very old gcc-s. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dwarf2 stuck Re: lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans?
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: dwarf2 stuck Re: lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans?
- References:
- lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans?
- From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>
- Re: dwarf2 stuck Re: lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans?
- From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>
- Re: dwarf2 stuck Re: lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans?
- From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
- Re: dwarf2 stuck Re: lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans?
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans?
- Prev by Date: Re: Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernelcommunity?
- Next by Date: Re: Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernel community?
- Previous by thread: Re: dwarf2 stuck Re: lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans?
- Next by thread: Re: dwarf2 stuck Re: lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans?
- Index(es):
![]() |