On Monday 16 October 2006 15:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> 16.10.06 15:08 >>>
> >On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> >> >Yes, it was compiled using gcc 4.0.2, specifically gcc (GCC) 4.0.2
> >> >20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8). I can easily reproduce this, what
> >> >additional information do you need? Or should I just try with newer
> >> >gcc?
> >> Two possible paths:
> >> a) Try with gcc 4.1.x.
> >
> >Will do probably later today.
> >
> >> b) Send me the offending .o (presumably the one containing
> >> dibusb_dib3000mc_tuner_attach)
> >
> >You can get it from http://www.jikos.cz/jikos/junk/dibusb-common.o
>
> Yes, unfortunately this is another instance of gcc 4.0 generating bad
> unwind data when optimizing and not accumulating outgoing args.
> Andi - did you already create a patch implementing Michael's suggestion?
You mean using -maccumulate-outgoing-args ? Not yet.
I guess we can do it unconditionally for all gccs on both i386
and x86-64, right?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
