Ar Sul, 2006-10-15 am 00:08 -0700, ysgrifennodd David Brownell: > Since it's not an error, there should be no such printk ... which > is exactly how it's coded above. The underlying bug is that someone marked pci_set_mwi must-check, that's wrong for most of the drivers that use it. If you remove the must check annotation from it then the problem and a thousand other spurious warnings go away. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- Next by Date: Re: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- Previous by thread: Re: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- Next by thread: Re: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
- Index(es):
 |