Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal

On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 16:00 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Gwe, 2006-10-13 am 17:10 +0530, ysgrifennodd Amol Lad:
> > Removed save_flags()/cli()/sti() and used (light weight) spin locks
> > 
> 
> Have you tested this and verified there are no recursive locking cases
> in your changes ?

I doxygend riscom8.c and used call graphs to verify there are no
recursive locks. I did a code review also

Due to lack of hardware, I was not able to do any runtime checks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal
  - From: Amol Lad <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] remove duplicated cpu_mask_to_apicid in x86_64 smp.h
Next by Date: Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/riscom8.c: save_flags()/cli()/sti() removal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]