On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:42:44PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > And yes, we realize that this is a large number of patches, sorry...
>
> I number of these patches were cleanups, such as removing code betewen
> #if 0, removing header files from being exported, etc. Not bad
> things, but I wouldn't have thought it would have met the criteria for
> being added to -stable. Are you intentionally relaxing the criteria?
The header file stuff was intentionally added, as it is good to have the
header files exported properly. Those were a large number of these
patches.
If you have specific questions about any one patch, please let us know.
I didn't purposefully take any "cleanup" type patch that I know of, but
there was a lot here, so one might have slipped in...
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
