On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:35:22AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:42:44PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > And yes, we realize that this is a large number of patches, sorry...
> >
> > I number of these patches were cleanups, such as removing code betewen
> > #if 0, removing header files from being exported, etc. Not bad
> > things, but I wouldn't have thought it would have met the criteria for
> > being added to -stable. Are you intentionally relaxing the criteria?
>
> The header file stuff was intentionally added, as it is good to have the
> header files exported properly. Those were a large number of these
> patches.
Indeed. I see this as just 'finishing the job' rather than fixing something
that's busted though. That said, I was also carrying these in what will
be our 2.6.18 based update kernel for FC5 (and what will be FC6) for the
same reasons.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
