On Tue, 2006-10-10 15:16:03 +0200, Jan Kara <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is this possibly related to the issues that are discussed in another > > thread? We're seeing problems while unlinking large files (usually get > > it within some hours with 200MB files, but couldn't yet reproduce it > > with 20MB.) > I don't think this is related (BTW: I've run your test for 5 hours > without any luck ;( Maybe I'll try again for some longer time...). Looking at it, I also think it's a different thing. Just to add, I couldn't make it bug with a 10 MB file in a day, but it failed again using a 100MB file. So file size seems to matter somehow. MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] +49-172-7608481 Signature of: Wenn ich wach bin, träume ich. the second :
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
- From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
- From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
- From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ixgb: Delete IXGB_DBG() macro and call pr_debug() directly.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] preserve correct battery state through suspend/resume cycles
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.18 ext3 panic.
- Next by thread: Panic from mptspi_dv_renegotiate_work in 2.6.18-mm2
- Index(es):
 |