Why is device_create_file __must_check?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am seeing a bunch of warnings about not checking the return value
from device_create_file() for code like this (from
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c):

static ssize_t pci_show_devspec(struct device *dev,
		struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
	struct pci_dev *pdev;
	struct device_node *np;

	pdev = to_pci_dev (dev);
	np = pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev);
	if (np == NULL || np->full_name == NULL)
		return 0;
	return sprintf(buf, "%s", np->full_name);
}
static DEVICE_ATTR(devspec, S_IRUGO, pci_show_devspec, NULL);

void pcibios_add_platform_entries(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
	device_create_file(&pdev->dev, &dev_attr_devspec);
}

What bad thing could happen if device_create_file fails, other than
that the "devspec" file doesn't appear in sysfs?  I don't see how the
error could lead to any null pointer dereference later on or anything
like that.  If some bad thing could happen, how do I avert that?  If
nothing bad will happen, why does device_create_file have __must_check
on it?

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux