Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:55:17PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:45:06 -0700
>>> "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> - It took maybe ten hours solid work to get this dogpile vaguely
>>>>> compiling and limping to a login prompt on x86, x86_64 and powerpc.
>>>>> I guess it's worth briefly testing if you're keen.
>>>> PPC64 blades shit themselves in a strange way. Possibly the udev
>>>> breakage you mentioned? Hard to tell really if people are going to
>>>> go around breaking userspace compatibility ;-(
>>> What version of udev is it running?
>> Ok, this is not a blade, but a ppc lpar. Its running the following
>> version of udev:
>>
>> udevinfo, version 021_bk
>>
>> (Assuming of course the help for udev info -V is not lying when it says
>> "-V print udev version".)
>
> What distro shipped 021_bk for a version of udev? What is running on
> this machine?
>
> (yeah, I know this is a old message, but I'm trying to fix up the udev
> issues right now...)
Hmmm. The machine claims to be running SuSE. We have it recorded as
SLES9, but I actually can't find any way to tell from the machine which
actual release thereof it is.
This version of ud
gekko-lp1:~ # udevinfo -V
udevinfo, version 021_bk
gekko-lp1:~ # rpm -qa | grep udev
udev-021-36.32
This seems to be the correct version for the first GA of SLES9.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
