On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:55:17PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:45:06 -0700
> > "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>> - It took maybe ten hours solid work to get this dogpile vaguely
> >>> compiling and limping to a login prompt on x86, x86_64 and powerpc.
> >>> I guess it's worth briefly testing if you're keen.
> >> PPC64 blades shit themselves in a strange way. Possibly the udev
> >> breakage you mentioned? Hard to tell really if people are going to
> >> go around breaking userspace compatibility ;-(
> >
> > What version of udev is it running?
>
> Ok, this is not a blade, but a ppc lpar. Its running the following
> version of udev:
>
> udevinfo, version 021_bk
>
> (Assuming of course the help for udev info -V is not lying when it says
> "-V print udev version".)
What distro shipped 021_bk for a version of udev? What is running on
this machine?
(yeah, I know this is a old message, but I'm trying to fix up the udev
issues right now...)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
