Re: [PATCH] lockdep: annotate nfs/nfsd in-kernel sockets

Peter Zijlstra wrote:

On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 18:24 +1000, Neil Brown wrote:

That is very much an nfs-client issue, so reclassifying the
server-side sockets seems irrelevant.  Doesn't cause any harm though I
suppose.

SteveD had a case that required the svc change, Steve was that the same
trace or another?

Through some simply 'hello world' server testing, I as able to
make these locking dependence warnings pop...

steved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] lockdep: annotate nfs/nfsd in-kernel sockets
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] lockdep: annotate nfs/nfsd in-kernel sockets
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] lockdep: annotate nfs/nfsd in-kernel sockets
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] lockdep: annotate nfs/nfsd in-kernel sockets
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] lockdep: annotate nfs/nfsd in-kernel sockets
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: fix crypto_alloc_{tfm,base}() return value
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/3] mm: fault handler to replace nopage and populate
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] lockdep: annotate nfs/nfsd in-kernel sockets
• Next by thread: Re: sluggish system responsiveness under higher IO load
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]