Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 10:45:50AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Trond,
> 
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:05:48AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >> In any case, what the fuck gives you the right to appoint yourself judge
> >> and jury over kernel regressions?
> 
> On 10/8/06, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >I've given this right myself - everyone can always send any bug list he
> >wants to linux-kernel.
> 
> I don't see what the problem here is. As stated in the bug report, a
> patch signed off by you broke something in the kernel which is not yet
> fixed in -git. Aside from calling people "guilty", what Adrian is
> doing is a service to us all.

It seems the word "Guilty" was considered offensive by some people?

This wasn't my intention, and I've replaced it with "Caused-By".

>                                               Pekka

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux