On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 23:18 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, keith mannthey wrote:
>
> > > In file included from arch/i386/mach-generic/summit.c:17:
> > > include/asm/mach-summit/mach_apic.h: In function 'apicid_to_node':
> > > include/asm/mach-summit/mach_apic.h:91: error: 'apicid_2_node' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > include/asm/mach-summit/mach_apic.h:91: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > include/asm/mach-summit/mach_apic.h:91: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > > Is the patch below correct?
> > Well I guess it would fix the apicid_2_node build error but I can't
> > think of a single good reason to be in a config where you would need any
> > of the summit code in UP. Perhaps a kconfig or makefile change in the
> > right spot would be better.
>
> Yes, this was in fact a product of a random .config (but allowed by
> Kconfig rules). There should definitely be a Kconfig rule not allowing
> having this non-working .config settings.
>
> I guess that probably making CONFIG_X86_GENERIC dependent on CONFIG_SMP
> would not be good, because the mach-default/ makes sense even on UP, am I
> right
Yea I am pretty sure CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is ment to boot UP and SMP
kernels.
Maybe just moving apicid_2_node to a UP safe location would be a good
way to go as well. I overlooked the fact that CONFIG_X86_GENERIC wasn't
always SMP.
Thanks,
Keith
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
