On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:03:37 -0700
john stultz <[email protected]> wrote:
> static int timer_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> - unsigned long sec;
> - unsigned long ctime = get_cmos_time();
> - long sleep_length = (ctime - sleep_start) * HZ;
> - struct timespec ts;
> -
> - if (sleep_length < 0) {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "CMOS clock skew detected in timer resume!\n");
> - /* The time after the resume must not be earlier than the time
> - * before the suspend or some nasty things will happen
> - */
> - sleep_length = 0;
> - ctime = sleep_start;
> - }
> #ifdef CONFIG_HPET_TIMER
> if (is_hpet_enabled())
> hpet_reenable();
> #endif
> setup_pit_timer();
> -
> - sec = ctime + clock_cmos_diff;
> - ts.tv_sec = sec;
> - ts.tv_nsec = 0;
> - do_settimeofday(&ts);
> - write_seqlock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags);
> - jiffies_64 += sleep_length;
> - write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags);
> touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> return 0;
> }
In this version of the patch, you no longer remove the
touch_softlockup_watchdog() call from timer_resume().
But clockevents-drivers-for-i386.patch deletes timer_resume()
altogether.
Hence we might need to put that re-added touch_softlockup_watchdog() call
into somewhere else now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
