Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc

["jdow" <jdow@earthlink.net>]

From: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@osdl.org>
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > How did OSDL's MX checking deal with split in/out configurations like ours,
> > where our MX points at a load-balanced farm of Mirapoint front end appliances
> > with 1 IP address, but our main off-campus *outbound* comes from a different
> > address?
>
> Hey, if I knew what I was doing, I'd be in MIS. 
>
> As it is, I just criticise other peoples patches.

DK or DKIM comes to mind. SpamAssassin 3.1.5 handles it neatly.

Off hand expecting a list to maintain perfect anti-spam is rather
difficult. Distributed processing works better. Folks should have
their own anti-spam tools and train them to their own preferences.

(It helps with a list like this one to have a SpamAssassin meta
rule that boosts the scores for BAYES_80 and above while reducing
scores for BAYES_40 and below. It also helps to run a lot of the
SARE, SpamAssassin Rules Emporium, rule sets. Pick and choose for
your particular needs. http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules)

{^_^}   Joanne
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/