On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:02:36 PDT, Linus Torvalds said: > > MX checking is as broken or more broken than bayes. > > I have to say, OSDL has been doing MX checking, and it's effective as > hell. Most importantly, when it _does_ break, it's not because some > "content" is considered inappropriate, it's because some ISP does > something technically wrong. How did OSDL's MX checking deal with split in/out configurations like ours, where our MX points at a load-balanced farm of Mirapoint front end appliances with 1 IP address, but our main off-campus *outbound* comes from a different address?
Attachment:
pgppHCaCWZARV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
- References:
- Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
- From: Matti Aarnio <[email protected]>
- Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
- Prev by Date: Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
- Next by Date: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 006 of 8] knfsd: nfsd4: fslocations data structures
- Previous by thread: Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
- Next by thread: Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
- Index(es):