Re: [PATCH] schedule ftape removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 01:05:28 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> index 9364f47..57e72e6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -325,3 +325,11 @@ Why:	i2c-isa is a non-sense and doesn't 
>  Who:	Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
>  
>  ---------------------------
> +
> +What:	ftape
> +When:	2.6.20
> +Why:	Orphaned for ages.  SMP bugs long unfixed.  Few users left
> +	in the world.
> +Who:	Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

I actually have the hardware, but with a capacity of 1.6GB
per tape and transfer speeds at a few hundred KB/s it's not
the most practical backup solution today.

Removing it is perfectly acceptable for me.

/Mikael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux