Re: [PATCH 3/8] at91_serial -> atmel_serial: Kconfig symbols

[Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>]

On 28 Sep 2006 10:34:49 +0200
Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com> wrote:

> hi Haavard,
> 
> > Rename the following Kconfig symbols:
> >   * CONFIG_SERIAL_AT91 -> CONFIG_SERIAL_ATMEL
> >   * CONFIG_SERIAL_AT91_CONSOLE -> CONFIG_SERIAL_ATMEL_CONSOLE
> >   * CONFIG_SERIAL_AT91_TTYAT -> CONFIG_SERIAL_ATMEL_TTYAT
> 
> 
> > -config SERIAL_AT91
> > -	bool "AT91RM9200 / AT91SAM9261 serial port support"
> > +config SERIAL_ATMEL
> > +	bool "AT91 / AT32 on-chip serial port support"
> >  	depends on ARM && (ARCH_AT91RM9200 || ARCH_AT91SAM9261)
> >  	select SERIAL_CORE
> >  	help
> >  	  This enables the driver for the on-chip UARTs of the
> > Atmel AT91RM9200 and AT91SAM926 processor.
> 
> Shouldn't this dependency be:
>    depends on (ARM && ARCH_AT91) || AVR32
> 
> (The "ARCH_AT91RM9200 || ARCH_AT91SAM9261" can be replaced with
> ARCH_AT91 since the driver should usable on the RM9200, SAM9261 and
> SAM9260)

Oh, I didn't know that symbol existed. I just looked at the serial
Kconfig, not arch/arm/Kconfig. You're right of course.

> The help text should probably also be updated for these 3 options so
> that it mentions the AVR32.

Right. Probably shouldn't have changed the prompt -- I have a different
patch that actually adds AVR32 support (I don't want to do that before
it actually compiles on AVR32, in case some crazy person comes along
and tries out allyesconfig ;)

Is it OK if I keep the patch as it is and change the dependency and
help text in a later patch?

Haavard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/