Re: Does this work? "dcprobes" an x86-hack simple djprobes-equivalent?

[Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>]

Hi Karim,

Thank you for new idea.
I discussed your proposal deeply with my coworkers.

I think your approach has following advantages/disadvantages/problem;
<advantages>
(a) Able to be inserted into the target address of the branch.
(b) So, binary analysis tool becomes simple.
<disadvantages>
(c) Implementation is much complicated.
(d) Highly depend on the x86 arch.
(e) Bigger overhead than djprobe.
(f) There will be side effect(*)
<problem>
(g) User applications can modify LDT. (ex. wine)

I think the dcprobe will work, but, unfortunately, it has
an vulnerability by the problem (g).

(*) In the following code:
---
a=0
do {
...
a++;
}while (a <= 100)
---
In case of inserting dcprobe at the 1st line (a=0),
it will replace 2nd (or more) instructions.
In this case, the fix up routine (based on int3)
will be invoked one hundred times.

Thanks,



-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
2nd Research Dept.
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/