Re: Does this work? "dcprobes" an x86-hack simple djprobes-equivalent?

Slight binary typo ...

Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Of course, this means hardwiring a multiplexing function at
> 0xCCCC,0xCCCCCCCC, if that makes any sense (offset 0xCCCCCCCC
> of code segment entry 7,099 of the LDT with an RPL of 1).

Actually 0xCCCC is code segment entry 6,553 of the LDT with an
RPL of 0.

Karim
-- 
President  / Opersys Inc.
Embedded Linux Training and Expertise
www.opersys.com  /  1.866.677.4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Does this work? "dcprobes" an x86-hack simple djprobes-equivalent?
  - From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: New Intel feature flags.
Next by Date: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
Previous by thread: Does this work? "dcprobes" an x86-hack simple djprobes-equivalent?
Next by thread: Re: Does this work? "dcprobes" an x86-hack simple djprobes-equivalent?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]