Ar Maw, 2006-09-26 am 09:56 +0100, ysgrifennodd David Woodhouse: > On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 04:52 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > The irq is a special case no matter how we try to prettyify it. We need > > two irqs, and PCI only gives us one per device. > > That's fine -- but don't use zero to mean none. We have NO_IRQ for that, > and zero isn't an appropriate choice. Let me correct that - you *had* NO_IRQ. It isn't defined for most platforms any more in -mm it seems. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- Next by Date: [Patch] Overrun in drivers/scsi/scsi.c
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
- Index(es):
 |