Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>]

On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 16:46 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Llu, 2006-09-25 am 15:39 +0100, ysgrifennodd David Howells:
> > Why does the arch have to supply those numbers?  What's wrong with my
> > suggested patch?  According to code in libata, these are _legacy_ access
> > methods, and on FRV they aren't currently required, so why can't I dispense
> 
> "legacy, legacy, legacy" "wont wont wont"
> 
> The ports in question are PCI values. They come from the PCI
> specifications and apply to any device with PCI bus, unless it has
> special mappings. The same logic you are whining about is already partly
> handled in the generic pci quirks code, and in time will end up with the
> I/O port value fixups there anyway.
>
> See quirk_ide_bases in drivers/pci/quirks.c

If we can do that with PCI quirks, why the need to hard-code it in the
IDE driver too?

And IRQ zero isn't particularly helpful suggestion -- using an invalid
IRQ number would be better. Like NO_IRQ or IDE_NO_IRQ, which should be
-1.

Don't make me dig out the board where the PCI slots all get IRQ 0 :)

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/