Re: [PATCH] restore __iomem annotations in e1000

Auke Kok wrote:

Jeff Garzik wrote:

applied

Thanks,

I have no idea why and when these annotations were lost, but we have them in much older versions of the code. I'll try to track it down and make sure that it doesn't disappear again.

Just run an sparse check as described in
Documentation/sparse.txt...

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] restore __iomem annotations in e1000
    • From: Auke Kok <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] restore __iomem annotations in e1000
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] restore __iomem annotations in e1000
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] restore __iomem annotations in e1000
    • From: Auke Kok <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: "qc timeout" error in sata_sil 3114 driver, 2.6.18
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] epoll_pwait for 2.6.18 ...
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] restore __iomem annotations in e1000
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] restore __iomem annotations in e1000
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]