Re: [PATCH] Restore the original TX FIFO overflow process.

Ok, I will generate new patch according to this.

Thanks.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Morton" <[email protected]>
To: "Jesse Huang" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore the original TX FIFO overflow process.


On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:50:41 -0700
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> I suggest you send a complete new patch series against Jeff's latest tree.
> I'll send you a copy of that.

attached.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Restore the original TX FIFO overflow process.
    • From: Jesse Huang <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Restore the original TX FIFO overflow process.
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Use %gs for per-cpu sections in kernel
• Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Restore the original TX FIFO overflow process.
• Next by thread: Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7179] New: Compilation of .tmp_linux1 fails due to missing declaration in net/netfilter/xt_physdev.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]