Re: [PATCH] Restore the original TX FIFO overflow process.

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:30:01 -0400
Jesse Huang <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Jesse Huang <[email protected]>
> 
> Change Logs:
>    - Restore the original TX FIFO overflow process.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Huang <[email protected]>
> 
> ...
>
> +						txthreshold = ioread16 (ioaddr + TxStartThresh);

Your patch ip100a-fix-tx-pause-bug-reset_tx-intr_handler.patch removed
TxStartThresh, so it won't compile.

I don't have a clue what's happening with this driver - I'll drop everything.

I suggest you send a complete new patch series against Jeff's latest tree. 
I'll send you a copy of that.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Restore the original TX FIFO overflow process.
    • From: Jesse Huang <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.18 - vesafb unaiavilable if fbcon compiled as module
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Use %gs for per-cpu sections in kernel
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Restore the original TX FIFO overflow process.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Restore the original TX FIFO overflow process.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]