Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org> wrote:

> > > Then you lose the ability to trace in-kernel minor page faults.
> > 
> > that's wrong, minor pagefaults go through __handle_mm_fault() just as 
> > much.
> > 
> 
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On a 2.6.17 kernel tree :

> It seems like a shortcut path that will never call __handle_mm_fault. 
> This path is precisely used to handle vmalloc faults.

yes, but you said "minor fault", not "vmalloc fault".

minor faults are the things that happen when a task does read-after-COW 
or read-mmap-ed-pagecache-page, and they very much go through 
__handle_mm_fault().

vmalloc faults are extremely rare, x86-specific and they are a pure 
kernel-internal matter. (I'd never want to trace them, especially if it 
pushes tracepoints into every architecture's page fault handler. I 
implemented the initial version of them IIRC, but my memory fails 
precisely why. I think it was 4:4 related, but i'm unsure.)

(i now realize that above you said "in-kernel minor faults" - under that 
you meant vmalloc faults?)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/