Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote:

> >   "As an example, LTTng traces the page fault handler, when kprobes 
> >   just can't instrument it."
> > 
> > but tracing a raw pagefault at the arch level is a bad idea anyway, 
> > we want to trace __handle_mm_fault(). That way you can avoid having 
> > to modify every architecture's pagefault handler ...
> 
> Then you lose the ability to trace in-kernel minor page faults.

that's wrong, minor pagefaults go through __handle_mm_fault() just as 
much.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux