Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
From what I see in 2.6.17/2.6.18 makefiles, only -OS and -O2 are generally used by the build system (no -O3) and there is not use of -funroll-loops. Iguess it must not be so useful in this context.
Putting a marker in an inlined function would have the same effect. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
- Next by Date: [RFC] Initial alpha-0 for new page allocator API
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
- Next by thread: [BUG] i386 2.6.18 cpu_up: attempt to bring up CPU 4 failed : kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2698!
- Index(es):
 |