Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)

Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

From what I see in 2.6.17/2.6.18 makefiles, only -OS and -O2 are generally used by the build system (no -O3) and there is not use of -funroll-loops. I

guess it must not be so useful in this context.

Putting a marker in an inlined function would have the same effect.

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
• Next by Date: [RFC] Initial alpha-0 for new page allocator API
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
• Next by thread: [BUG] i386 2.6.18 cpu_up: attempt to bring up CPU 4 failed : kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2698!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]