(Subject rewritten, developer cc'ed, thwap delivered)
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:09:57 -0700
"Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > introduce-config_zone_dma.patch
> > optional-zone_dma-in-the-vm.patch
> > optional-zone_dma-in-the-vm-tidy.patch
> > optional-zone_dma-for-i386.patch
> > optional-zone_dma-for-x86_64.patch
> > optional-zone_dma-for-ia64.patch
> > remove-zone_dma-remains-from-parisc.patch
> > remove-zone_dma-remains-from-sh-sh64.patch
>
> Would it not make sense to define what ZONE_DMA actually means
> consistently before trying to change it? The current mess across
> different architectures seems like a disaster area to me.
>
> What DOES requesting ZONE_DMA from a driver actually mean?
>
AFAIK it means "floppy disks" ;)
My concern about these patches is that they'll only be useful for
self-compiled kernels, because distros will be forced to enable ZONE_DMA
for evermore anyway.
If that's correct then perhaps we should drop these patches, because they
will serve to weaken ongoing testing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]