On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:36 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote:
>
> > > How does the containers implementation under discussion behave if a
> > > process is part of a container and the container is removed?
> > It first removes all the tasks belonging to this container (which means
> > resetting the container pointers in task_struct and then per page
> > container pointer belonging to anonymous pages). It then clears the
> > container pointers in the mapping structure and also in the pages
> > belonging to these files.
>
> So the application continues to run unharmed?
>
It will hit a one time penalty of getting those pointers reset, but
besides that it will continue to run fine.
> Could we equip containers with restrictions on processors and nodes for
> NUMA?
>
Yes. That is something we will have to do (I think part of CPU
handler-TBD).
-rohit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
