On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Paul Jackson wrote: > the kernel. A useful memory containerization should (IMHO) allow for > both adding and removing such containers. How does the containers implementation under discussion behave if a process is part of a container and the container is removed? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- References:
- [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Documentation fixes in intel810.txt
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] jiffies: Add 64bit jiffies compares (needed when long < 64bit).
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- Next by thread: Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
- Index(es):
 |