On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Yes, I read that in your patches, I was wondering how the cpuset
> approach would handle this.
>
> Neither are really satisfactory for shared mappings.
>
In which way? We could have the per container flag indicating whether
to charge this container for shared mapping that it initiates or to the
container where mapping belongs...or is there something different that
you are referring.
-rohit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
