On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 03:00 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> (this time to the lists as well)
>
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > I'd much rather containterize the whole reclaim code, which should not
> > be too hard since he already adds a container pointer to struct page.
>
>
Right now the memory handler in this container subsystem is written in
such a way that when existing kernel reclaimer kicks in, it will first
operate on those (container with pages over the limit) pages first. But
in general I like the notion of containerizing the whole reclaim code.
> > I still have to reread what Rohit does for file backed pages, that gave
> > my head a spin.
Please let me know if there is any specific part that isn't making much
sense.
-rohit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
