Re: [PATCH 0/7] Integrity Service and SLIM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 2006-09-14 16:51:13, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:57:25 -0700
> Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > This is an updated request for comments on a proposed integrity 
> > service framework and dummy provider, along with SLIM, a low 
> > water-mark mandatory access control LSM module which utilizes the 
> > integrity services as additional input to the access control decisions.
> 
> Having carefully reviewed your code I have come to the firm conclusion that
> it is written in C.  The next step is to put it all in -mm and see if
> anyone shouts at me.

Hmmm, "it is written in C" does not seem like good enough reason to
merge it... right?

I tried to understand what it is good for, but it seems that in
current state it is not much good for anything.

Will IBM work at splitting ssh so that trusted/untrusted portions are
separated?

								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux