Re: [PATCH 0/7] Integrity Service and SLIM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:57:25 -0700
Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is an updated request for comments on a proposed integrity 
> service framework and dummy provider, along with SLIM, a low 
> water-mark mandatory access control LSM module which utilizes the 
> integrity services as additional input to the access control decisions.

Having carefully reviewed your code I have come to the firm conclusion that
it is written in C.  The next step is to put it all in -mm and see if
anyone shouts at me.

I'll need help on the upstream-merge decision.

A convincing statement of interest (or, better, intent) from vendors (ie:
the people who will deliver and support this into the target users) would
help a lot.  Where do we stand with that?

Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux