Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP

Vincent Pelletier <vincent.plr <at> wanadoo.fr> writes:
> I'll do some tests soon to see which version gives better performance at a 
> higher level than just process migration cost - if different at all.

I think that your patch should improve the performance because process
migrations are expensive (cache miss) and should be avoided when not 
really necessary.

Cheers,

  Ludovic.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
  - From: "Antonio Vargas" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
  - From: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
  - From: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
  - From: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: tracing - consensus building insteat of dogfights
Next by Date: 2.6.18-rc7 boot only with acpi=off
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]