I found one maybe-drawback to this change :
When runing n+1 process (n = number of cpu), one takes one cpu, the other 2
share another cpu. And, because of this patch, all processes stay in their
own cpu, so one always has 100% of cpu power, the 2 others get 50% each.
In current implementation, one of the 2 processes from the same cpu would
migrate to the other cpu, and so on, somehow sharing cpu time among them.
Is it a feature or a side effect of current implementation ?
I'll do some tests soon to see which version gives better performance at a
higher level than just process migration cost - if different at all.
--
Vincent Pelletier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
