Hi - On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 08:49:40PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > [...] > Then what we really need by the sound of it is enough gcc smarts to do > something of the form [...] > .section "debugbits" > [...] > Can gcc do any of that for us today ? This is not that different from what gcc does for DWARF. Trouble is, there appear to exist optimization transformations which make such data difficult or impossible to generate. (In particular, it is unlikely to be easier to create specialized data like this if the compiler can't be made to create first-class DWARF for the same probe points / data values.) - FChE
Attachment:
pgpHTYVLPOjgU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <[email protected]>
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <[email protected]>
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- From: Vara Prasad <[email protected]>
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] aic94xx: Compile problem on s390
- Next by Date: Re: 8 hours of battery life on thinkpad x60
- Previous by thread: Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- Next by thread: Re: tracepoint maintainance models
- Index(es):
 |