Re: tracepoint maintainance models

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ar Llu, 2006-09-18 am 17:02 +0200, ysgrifennodd Ingo Molnar:
> also, there should be only a single switch for markups: either all of 
> them are compiled in or none of them. That simplifies the support 
> picture and gets rid of some ugly #ifdefs. Distro kernels will likely 
> enable all of thems, so there will be nice uniformity all across.

I think your implementation is questionable if it causes any kind of
jumps and conditions, even marked unlikely. Just put the needed data in
a seperate section which can be used by the debugging tools. No need to
actually mess with the code for the usual cases.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux