Ar Llu, 2006-09-18 am 18:15 +0200, ysgrifennodd Ingo Molnar:
> Do you consider a single 5-byte NOP for a judiciously chosen 50 places
> in the kernel unacceptable? Note that the argument has shifted from
Its not neccessary. The question about acceptability doesn't come up.
> static tracers to dynamic tracers: this _is_ about SystemTap: it adds
> points to the kernel where we can _guarantee_ that a dynamic probe can
> be inserted.
That already exists. You don't always know the address of the point.
Knowing where to stick the probe is out of line, shoving nops in the
code is an ugly unneccessary hack.
You can't really have it both ways - you argued that the performance
improvement for LTT static traces wasn't justification and pointed out
jprobes then optimised int3. Now if you want to do markup for awkward
tracepoints for kprobe use then the same rules seem to apply - jprobes
and the int3 optimisation mean you don't need to go shoving nops in code
paths that are used all the time.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
