Re: tracepoint maintainance models

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Roman Zippel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Static tracers also need the 
> > guarantee of a _full set_ of static markups. It is that _guarantee_ of a 
> > full set that i'm arguing against primarily.
> 
> To those who are still reading this, let's fill this with a bit of 
> meaning (Ingo is unfortunately rather unspecific here):

Please make your own points instead of positing to "fill in" my points 
with "a bit of meaning". My words can certainly speak for themselves, 
and they do so in extensive specificity.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux