Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

Hi,

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> btw., you still have not retracted or corrected your false suggestion 
> that "concessions" or a "compromise" were possible and you did not 
> retract or correct your false accusation that i "dont want to make 
> them":

Sorry, I have nothing to retract and I'm not interesting in playing your 
word games. :-(

> > It's impossible to discuss this with you, because you're absolutely 
> > unwilling to make any concessions. What am I supposed to do than it's 
> > very clear to me, that you don't want to make any compromise anyway?
> 
> while, as i explained it before, such a concession simply does not exist 
> - so i am not in the position to "make such a concession". There are 
> only two choices in essence: either we accept a generic static tracer, 
> or we reject it.

Wrong, this is about the minimum support, which can be used by both static 
and dynamic tracers.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux