* Roman Zippel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ingo, you happily still ignore my primary issues, how serious do you
> expect me to take this?
I did not ignore your new "primary issues", to the contrary. Please read
my replies. To recap, your "primary issues" are:
> The foremost issue is still that there is only limited kprobes
> support.
> The main issue in supporting static tracers are the tracepoints and so
> far I haven't seen any convincing proof that the maintainance overhead
> of dynamic and static tracepoints has to be significantly different.
to both points i (and others) already replied in great detail - please
follow up on them. (I can quote message-IDs if you cannot find them.)
[ Or if it's not these two then let me know if i missed some important
point - it's easy to miss a valid point in a sea of of replies.
For example yesterday i have replied to 7 different issues _you_
raised, partly issues where you have questioned my credibility and
competence, so i felt compelled to reply - but still you replied to
none of those mails, only declaring them "secondary" in a passing
reference. If they were secondary then why did you raise them in the
first place? Or do you summarily concede all those points by not
replying to them? And is there any guarantee that you will reply to
any mails i write to you now? Will you declare them "secondary" too
once the argument appears to turn unfavorable to your position? ]
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
