On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 21:59 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > It's hardly rocket science - it appears that nobody has ever bothered. > > Hmm, that's one explanation. The other explanation, which in my view is > the likelier -- but I've been shown wrong before, is that most of those > who went through that code before just didn't have Ingo's insight and > abilities. Which goes to show what can be achieved when "interesting" > ideas are given a hand by those having appropriate insight and > abilities -- and, of course, what fate awaits those other ideas which > are less so fortunate in the eyes of the talented. Praise the lord for > the chosen ones. (that bit after the last -- is a steaming pile of nastiness) I don't understand your reaction. If roles were reversed, would you not examine the implementation? -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Alter get_order() so that it can make use of ilog2() on a constant [try #3]
- Next by Date: Re: sluggish system responsiveness under higher IO load
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
- Index(es):