Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement

On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 21:59 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It's hardly rocket science - it appears that nobody has ever bothered.
> 
> Hmm, that's one explanation. The other explanation, which in my view is
> the likelier -- but I've been shown wrong before, is that most of those
> who went through that code before just didn't have Ingo's insight and
> abilities. Which goes to show what can be achieved when "interesting"
> ideas are given a hand by those having appropriate insight and
> abilities -- and, of course, what fate awaits those other ideas which
> are less so fortunate in the eyes of the talented. Praise the lord for
> the chosen ones.

(that bit after the last -- is a steaming pile of nastiness)

I don't understand your reaction.  If roles were reversed, would you not
examine the implementation?

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
    • From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
    • From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Alter get_order() so that it can make use of ilog2() on a constant [try #3]
• Next by Date: Re: sluggish system responsiveness under higher IO load
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]