Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement

Andrew Morton wrote:
> It's hardly rocket science - it appears that nobody has ever bothered.

Hmm, that's one explanation. The other explanation, which in my view is
the likelier -- but I've been shown wrong before, is that most of those
who went through that code before just didn't have Ingo's insight and
abilities. Which goes to show what can be achieved when "interesting"
ideas are given a hand by those having appropriate insight and
abilities -- and, of course, what fate awaits those other ideas which
are less so fortunate in the eyes of the talented. Praise the lord for
the chosen ones.

Karim
-- 
President  / Opersys Inc.
Embedded Linux Training and Expertise
www.opersys.com  /  1.866.677.4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
    • From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 05/22][RFC] Unionfs: Copyup Functionality
• Next by Date: [PATCH 1 of 11] MBCS: Use SEEK_{SET, CUR, END} instead of hardcoded values
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]